|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 21:03:17 GMT -8
Post by pudgejeff on May 27, 2009 21:03:17 GMT -8
I just wanted to bring this up because it seemed very unfair to me...Affter sim 11 and with the Clippers 27-21 and in the playoffs there GM started sitting there PG and then there SG and changing there style from inside scoring to outside scoring when obviously Roberts and Manning were there two best players...they went 9-22 doing this putting them in the middle of the lottery. They didn't have to blow up there team and trade away there good players like everyone else who was trying to lose did they just went against the rules. That doesn't seem fair to me and there has been no punishment whatsover even though it affected at least half of the lottery teams draft position as well as the Spurs who traded away a lot of there team and should have been in the lottery with the clippers in the playoffs. I may be off base here but I'd like to see what some of you guys think...especially some of the owners who blew up there team and played by the rules and now who's teams are lower in the lottery because of this.
|
|
|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 21:51:30 GMT -8
Post by pudgejeff on May 27, 2009 21:51:30 GMT -8
Maybe it's just me since it affected 2 and possibly 3 of my picks
|
|
|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 21:56:32 GMT -8
Post by cublacksheep on May 27, 2009 21:56:32 GMT -8
As someone who plays by the rules for the rebuild and who saw the DC in question, I have to agree
If your best player isn't your 1 option....that's gotta be an automatic red flag almost
|
|
|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 21:58:30 GMT -8
Post by pudgejeff on May 27, 2009 21:58:30 GMT -8
I would understand if it was one week...or one player...but it got way out of hand...and it's obvious by the change in records...27-21 to 9-22 I mean come on
|
|
|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 22:15:23 GMT -8
Post by boom on May 27, 2009 22:15:23 GMT -8
how about you pm mops......
inappropriate to post it here
|
|
|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 22:16:21 GMT -8
Post by pudgejeff on May 27, 2009 22:16:21 GMT -8
What's inappropriate about it?
|
|
|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 22:18:52 GMT -8
Post by lukeyrid13 on May 27, 2009 22:18:52 GMT -8
I honestly don't think he purposely tanked
|
|
|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 22:20:30 GMT -8
Post by pudgejeff on May 27, 2009 22:20:30 GMT -8
Really?...Have you gone and looked at the depth charts?...and how they changed?
|
|
|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 22:24:51 GMT -8
Post by pudgejeff on May 27, 2009 22:24:51 GMT -8
I mean they even switched the scoring from inside to outside when there whole team is set for inside scoring...and okay Jim Les has an A- from the outside...but wait even though he was by far the best PG on the team he wasn't even playing at all
|
|
|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 22:25:32 GMT -8
Post by lukeyrid13 on May 27, 2009 22:25:32 GMT -8
He had Roberts and Manning as 1,2 up until the last sim with inside scoring. So maybe he tanked 3 games but thats it
|
|
|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 22:30:36 GMT -8
Post by boom on May 27, 2009 22:30:36 GMT -8
Les was injured at the end of the year
|
|
|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 22:30:45 GMT -8
Post by pudgejeff on May 27, 2009 22:30:45 GMT -8
With outside focus...which is a big deal...and there best PG not playing which is even a bigger deal...because you have to be able to get the ball to you scorers and not turn it over
|
|
|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 22:32:38 GMT -8
Post by pudgejeff on May 27, 2009 22:32:38 GMT -8
Well it affected me(times 3), the Warriors(who have come on and stated they agreed), the Nets and maybe the Spurs.
|
|
|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 22:32:59 GMT -8
Post by boom on May 27, 2009 22:32:59 GMT -8
Les was injured at the end of the year |
|
|
|
Tanking
May 27, 2009 22:35:01 GMT -8
Post by pudgejeff on May 27, 2009 22:35:01 GMT -8
I never saw...that may be...if true then that explains some but not all of it...I'm not calling you a liar at all...hope it doesn't come of that way...but why do you say that?
|
|
