|
|
Post by Zyme on Jun 8, 2009 10:18:45 GMT -8
Los Angeles Receives:
Dana Barros
Nate McMillan
Wesley Person
Seattle 95 1st
Seattle 96 2nd
Seattle 97 1st
Seattle Receives:
Rony Seiklay
Doug Christie
Los Angeles Lakers cut Dennis Scott to make room
|
|
|
|
Post by jhopduck on Jun 8, 2009 10:20:46 GMT -8
Does this mean you have to take down the picture of Rony Seikaly's wife?
|
|
|
|
Post by Zyme on Jun 8, 2009 10:25:18 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Jun 8, 2009 11:57:50 GMT -8
I accept. Rony is a beastly rebounder with solid offensive game. He should be nice alongside Kemp. Christie is a decent defender too. I get out of Nate's kinda bad contract.
|
|
|
|
Post by duckancover on Jun 8, 2009 15:21:45 GMT -8
seems like a lot for the supersonics to give up
|
|
|
|
Post by lukeyrid13 on Jun 8, 2009 15:26:29 GMT -8
Agreed. Rony is good but Lakers were very actively shopping him, he could have probably been had for a lot less.
|
|
|
|
Post by pudgejeff on Jun 8, 2009 15:46:39 GMT -8
No I don't think they overpaid at all
|
|
|
|
Post by donatello2424 on Jun 8, 2009 15:49:13 GMT -8
Agreed. Rony is good but Lakers were very actively shopping him, he could have probably been had for a lot less. Less was 2 picks instead of the 3 he was originally asking of me. |
|
|
|
Post by lukeyrid13 on Jun 8, 2009 15:51:31 GMT -8
He's gonna be amazing on your team no doubt, but I think with patience he could have been had for cheaper cause Zyme was shopping him to everyone, thats all
|
|
aloc
Full Member
Spurs of San Antonio
Posts: 237
|
Post by aloc on Jun 8, 2009 17:16:58 GMT -8
one 1st would have been enough IMO, but that's just me...  |
|
|
|
Post by pudgejeff on Jun 8, 2009 17:19:00 GMT -8
He may have been actively shopping him but he wasn't dealing him at a discounted rate
|
|
|
|
Post by Zyme on Jun 8, 2009 17:26:29 GMT -8
He may have been actively shopping him but he wasn't dealing him at a discounted rate I know what my players are worth and it was nice to find a player that understood the same. Just because I am shopping a player means I am wanting to get rid of them for nothing. I would not have delt him if I knew I was not getting fair value. |
|
|
|
Post by mops on Jun 8, 2009 19:55:09 GMT -8
Done.
I wouldn't have traded Person if you had read his bio in the draft board.
|
|
